Why Not To Buy Not Rivian Calls With Two Days to Go?

It's obvious right? If you mess up and the stock opens the wrong way you only have one day for a rebound. Why put yourself in that position? Others might be in the camp of saying why not go for a fifty percent rebound on Thurday's morning opening. The stock sold of on Wednesday on very little volume. A morning pop is possible. The stock has being strong as of late. Here is it's five day chart. Now this, the seventeen series of Calls that expires in two days. They do look cheap after hitting a high of $1.55 on the day. If we look at a 30 day chart we will see that the stock is still in an uptrend. Why not look at the Call options one and two weeks out? Here are the seventeen series of Calls one and two weeks out They would be much safer to play and I will check in on these ones at a later date. So what happened on the Thursday opening? Let's switch gears for a moment and look at how Roku, a much higher priced stock opened and look at how their Call options moved.

Eli Lilly Calls With Four Days to Go.

This is a four day trading week starting with Tuesday. Monday was a holiday. Here is how the stock Eli Lilly traded on the last five days and in the last three months.
The stock is surging upwards (thanks to a new weight loss product) and the following Calls and Puts are very expensive. Here are Fridays closing prices on the 780 series Calls and Puts. First the Calls.The Calls cost $14.35 and the Puts cost $11.70. They only buy you four days of trading time.
Now here is a chart showing how the stock closed out the day.
Finally, here is how the 780 Calls and Puts closed the day.
So the stock lost $24.60 on the day. Note the" Open- Interest" on the Calls and Puts stayed the same from the previous day. What happened was "covered-Call-selling" in the morning, meaning as the stock tumbled it was a no brainer to be selling the Calls if you already owned the underlying stock and then buying them back at a profit later in the day. There was also some just outright "Put-buying" activities triggered in part by how quickly things were crumbling down in the late morning, also with the intentions of getting out before the end of the day. That's why the numbers of open interest activities ended up matching perfectly from the previous day. Most of this would be "programmed-buying" triggered in part by a general sell off of the markets in their entirety. What proof do I have that this is what went down? Well look at this early morning action.
Well 139 Put options where opened by 9:41 a.m. followed by
a volume of 157 Puts at 9:47 a.m. What this means is that in the first 17 minutes of trading,traders were nibling gingerly at this action. After that another 1442 contracts traded on the day or 721 "in-and-out" Puts transactions. It took the first fifteen minutes of trading to prove that a general freefall in the markets was about to happen. Telsa was down $6.19 on the day, Caterpillar was down $8.17 and Snowflake down $10.23. It was just one of those days were the high flyers got picked on. The small "retail players" didn't catch any of this action because at the start of the day both the Puts and the Calls were simply to expensive to play. "Covered Call writing" is a strategy that the "little sharks" can't afford to do.


Popular posts from this blog

I Wonder How The Back Office Is Going To Handle My Complaint

Disney Had A Good Week, Fisker Not So Much . Lion Electric and Taiga

Boeing Down $20.00 or 8.03% On A Monday Morning